<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Serving Static Content from a Cookieless Domain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ravelrumba.com/blog/static-cookieless-domain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ravelrumba.com/blog/static-cookieless-domain/</link>
	<description>web design &#38; web development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 04:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.ravelrumba.com/blog/static-cookieless-domain/comment-page-1/#comment-694</link>
		<dc:creator>Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 04:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravelrumba.com/?p=594#comment-694</guid>
		<description>Kyle, 

Cool. Smart people impress me ;)

Is there anyway to do this step (&quot;then on your server you set up a “ServerAlias” record in your Apache config&quot;), if you&#039;re on shared hosting without access to Apache&#039;s config? 

(I&#039;m able to keep sites on shared hosting surprisingly long given how much I optimize the code. And HawkHost&#039;s shared hosting is surprisingly fast too IMO. But I still like to get things set up well from the start when I can.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle, </p>
<p>Cool. Smart people impress me <img src='http://www.ravelrumba.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Is there anyway to do this step (&#8220;then on your server you set up a “ServerAlias” record in your Apache config&#8221;), if you&#8217;re on shared hosting without access to Apache&#8217;s config? </p>
<p>(I&#8217;m able to keep sites on shared hosting surprisingly long given how much I optimize the code. And HawkHost&#8217;s shared hosting is surprisingly fast too IMO. But I still like to get things set up well from the start when I can.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep</title>
		<link>http://www.ravelrumba.com/blog/static-cookieless-domain/comment-page-1/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravelrumba.com/?p=594#comment-691</guid>
		<description>Thanks for proving this useful information. I was checking for the exact information u elaborated here. my website needs to set some files as static... so i hope...i will be able to set now...if not then wil you please help me to set it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for proving this useful information. I was checking for the exact information u elaborated here. my website needs to set some files as static&#8230; so i hope&#8230;i will be able to set now&#8230;if not then wil you please help me to set it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.ravelrumba.com/blog/static-cookieless-domain/comment-page-1/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravelrumba.com/?p=594#comment-683</guid>
		<description>Thompson-
I wouldn&#039;t recommend, nor does 2static.it use, CNAME, as it will lead to an extra DNS lookup. 

However, if you set the DNS up with a separate record with the same IP address info as the primary domain (which is how 2static.it does it), and then on your server you set up a &quot;ServerAlias&quot; record in your Apache config, then no redirects happen and you have a true &quot;alias&quot; to your site. I&#039;ve tested and this provides very good performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thompson-<br />
I wouldn&#8217;t recommend, nor does 2static.it use, CNAME, as it will lead to an extra DNS lookup. </p>
<p>However, if you set the DNS up with a separate record with the same IP address info as the primary domain (which is how 2static.it does it), and then on your server you set up a &#8220;ServerAlias&#8221; record in your Apache config, then no redirects happen and you have a true &#8220;alias&#8221; to your site. I&#8217;ve tested and this provides very good performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buzzknow</title>
		<link>http://www.ravelrumba.com/blog/static-cookieless-domain/comment-page-1/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>buzzknow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravelrumba.com/?p=594#comment-682</guid>
		<description>Hi, nice article, but how to check if our domain cookieless or not?

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, nice article, but how to check if our domain cookieless or not?</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.ravelrumba.com/blog/static-cookieless-domain/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravelrumba.com/?p=594#comment-678</guid>
		<description>So I&#039;m thinking, using a separate domain might actually be faster than using a subdomain b/c a CNAME is technically a type of [dns] redirect isn&#039;t it? I doubt is would be noticeable. But this might explain why the big guys use a separate domain instead of a subdomain. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/748584/are-cnames-slow

This could be a good use for those .net domains I picked up to protect my .com brand. I&#039;ve got a bunch of those. However, I haven&#039;t tried changing my WordPress media upload settings to an entirely different domain yet. So I don&#039;t know.

And I don&#039;t know how Google images would treat it, if it would lead visitors to the .net instead of the .com.

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;m thinking, using a separate domain might actually be faster than using a subdomain b/c a CNAME is technically a type of [dns] redirect isn&#8217;t it? I doubt is would be noticeable. But this might explain why the big guys use a separate domain instead of a subdomain. <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/748584/are-cnames-slow" rel="nofollow">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/748584/are-cnames-slow</a></p>
<p>This could be a good use for those .net domains I picked up to protect my .com brand. I&#8217;ve got a bunch of those. However, I haven&#8217;t tried changing my WordPress media upload settings to an entirely different domain yet. So I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t know how Google images would treat it, if it would lead visitors to the .net instead of the .com.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
