<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cleaning Up Ad Server Scripts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ravelrumba.com/blog/cleaning-up-ad-server-scripts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ravelrumba.com/blog/cleaning-up-ad-server-scripts/</link>
	<description>web design &#38; development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peanut Gallery</title>
		<link>http://www.ravelrumba.com/blog/cleaning-up-ad-server-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-1531</link>
		<dc:creator>Peanut Gallery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravelrumba.com/?p=667#comment-1531</guid>
		<description>@BillC I think you are mistaken. 

Ghostwriter starts at 10,000k for one site (price not posted on their site, by the way), so he has 10,000 very good reasons, and he get a couple link backs to the site of which he is a &quot;Partner&quot;.

It&#039;s not above board and speaks volume about the company&#039;s ethics.

However, this article was great and its nice to see developers helping developers purely out of fraternity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BillC I think you are mistaken. </p>
<p>Ghostwriter starts at 10,000k for one site (price not posted on their site, by the way), so he has 10,000 very good reasons, and he get a couple link backs to the site of which he is a &#8220;Partner&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not above board and speaks volume about the company&#8217;s ethics.</p>
<p>However, this article was great and its nice to see developers helping developers purely out of fraternity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillC</title>
		<link>http://www.ravelrumba.com/blog/cleaning-up-ad-server-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-1530</link>
		<dc:creator>BillC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 01:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravelrumba.com/?p=667#comment-1530</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much for this solution.  I got the mandate today to implement this OAS code and when I looked at it, I felt like I it was the mid-90&#039;s again.  I used your solution and it&#039;s working fine.

I want to respond to the post from Will Alexander.  First, if you&#039;re going to promote a paid service (ghostwriter) that you work for, you *have* to disclose it.  Otherwise, it&#039;s just free advertising and not above board.

Second, your comment about iframe may be valid, but this ad server does not use an iframe.  It&#039;s possible that a given implementation might use that HTML tag, but mine certainly does not.  So, you&#039;re spreading FUD for no good reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for this solution.  I got the mandate today to implement this OAS code and when I looked at it, I felt like I it was the mid-90&#8242;s again.  I used your solution and it&#8217;s working fine.</p>
<p>I want to respond to the post from Will Alexander.  First, if you&#8217;re going to promote a paid service (ghostwriter) that you work for, you *have* to disclose it.  Otherwise, it&#8217;s just free advertising and not above board.</p>
<p>Second, your comment about iframe may be valid, but this ad server does not use an iframe.  It&#8217;s possible that a given implementation might use that HTML tag, but mine certainly does not.  So, you&#8217;re spreading FUD for no good reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.ravelrumba.com/blog/cleaning-up-ad-server-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-1469</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravelrumba.com/?p=667#comment-1469</guid>
		<description>@Wilf
I&#039;m new to this... I assume when you implement this method, you are using jsx instead of mjx.
&gt;&gt; document.getElementById(‘ad_pos_1′).appendChild(document.getElementById(‘ad_1_hidden’));

if ad_pos_1 is the container where the ad should show up, what would ad_1_hidden mean here? Please let me know, I need to implement oas using jsx method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Wilf<br />
I&#8217;m new to this&#8230; I assume when you implement this method, you are using jsx instead of mjx.<br />
&gt;&gt; document.getElementById(‘ad_pos_1′).appendChild(document.getElementById(‘ad_1_hidden’));</p>
<p>if ad_pos_1 is the container where the ad should show up, what would ad_1_hidden mean here? Please let me know, I need to implement oas using jsx method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.ravelrumba.com/blog/cleaning-up-ad-server-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-1461</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravelrumba.com/?p=667#comment-1461</guid>
		<description>I would strongly caution against the use of Willf&#039;s suggestion to move the ads after they&#039;ve been loaded -- Gecko and WebKit will reload an iframe when it&#039;s moved within the DOM.  This is going to lead to double-counting and an increase in overall load times.  http://digital-fulcrum.com/iframe-reloading-behavior/

Take a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://digital-fulcrum.com/solutions/ghostwriter-complete-control/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; ghostwriter&lt;/a&gt; which provides asynchronous loading of scripts that use document.write.  With it, you can post-load these ads pretty easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would strongly caution against the use of Willf&#8217;s suggestion to move the ads after they&#8217;ve been loaded &#8212; Gecko and WebKit will reload an iframe when it&#8217;s moved within the DOM.  This is going to lead to double-counting and an increase in overall load times.  <a href="http://digital-fulcrum.com/iframe-reloading-behavior/" rel="nofollow">http://digital-fulcrum.com/iframe-reloading-behavior/</a></p>
<p>Take a look at <a href="http://digital-fulcrum.com/solutions/ghostwriter-complete-control/" rel="nofollow"> ghostwriter</a> which provides asynchronous loading of scripts that use document.write.  With it, you can post-load these ads pretty easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://www.ravelrumba.com/blog/cleaning-up-ad-server-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravelrumba.com/?p=667#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>As the &quot;time-machine&quot; is back with IPhones and Ipads... does this refinment to show only rich media still apply?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the &#8220;time-machine&#8221; is back with IPhones and Ipads&#8230; does this refinment to show only rich media still apply?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

